深度分析 U.S.News公信力一降再降, 哈佛耶魯高調(diào)「退群」, 法學(xué)院邁出第一步 _大學(xué)

文章插圖

文章插圖

不敢退出排名的學(xué)校又該何去何從呢？是繼續(xù)為了依附排名提供漂亮的數(shù)據(jù)逐漸忘記初心？還是在如今的大環(huán)境下不顧招生，毅然追隨“大佬們”的腳步一起退出？

作者：橡樹(shù)君。如果喜歡藍(lán)橡樹(shù)的文章，請(qǐng)記得要把我們“設(shè)為星標(biāo)”哦！
一、頂尖法學(xué)院集體抵制
上周，繼哈佛大學(xué)、耶魯大學(xué)攜手宣布不再參與U.S.News的法學(xué)院排名后。
加州大學(xué)伯克利分校、哥倫比亞大學(xué)、斯坦福大學(xué)、喬治城大學(xué)和密歇根大學(xué)的法學(xué)院也先后宣布將退出排名。
而后橡樹(shù)君今天刷新了一下新聞，發(fā)現(xiàn)杜克大學(xué)、西北大學(xué)和加州大學(xué)洛杉磯分校的法學(xué)院也在這兩天紛紛官宣退出排名。

文章插圖

哈佛和耶魯法學(xué)院宣布退出排名

文章插圖

文章插圖

伯克利、哥大、斯坦福、喬治城和密歇根大學(xué)法學(xué)院宣布退出排名

文章插圖

文章插圖

杜克、西北和UCLA官宣退出法學(xué)院排名
這些學(xué)校都表示，排名系統(tǒng)對(duì)法學(xué)院本身增加社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)多樣性、支持低收入學(xué)生和鼓勵(lì)追求公共服務(wù)的目標(biāo)完全背道而馳。

因此，他們將不再提供本學(xué)院的任何數(shù)據(jù)用以參與排名。
Dear Members of the Harvard Law School Community,

I write today to share with you that Harvard Law School will no longer participate in the U.S. News & World Report rankings, effective this year. (Yale Law School announced a similar decision earlier today). We at HLS have made this decision because it has become impossible to reconcile our principles and commitments with the methodology and incentives the U.S. News rankings reflect. This decision was not made lightly and only after considerable deliberation over the past several months.
Done well, such rankings could convey accurate, relevant information about universities, colleges, and graduate and professional schools that may help students and families make informed choices about which schools best meet their needs. However, rankings can also emphasize characteristics that potentially mislead those who rely on them and can create perverse incentives that influence schools’ decisions in ways that undercut student choice and harm the interests of potential students.
Over several years now, a number of schools – including Harvard Law School – have brought to the attention of U.S. News, either directly or through the U.S. News Law Deans Advisory Board, the concerns that have motivated us to end our participation in the U.S. News process. In particular, we have raised concerns about aspects of the U.S. News ranking methodology (also highlighted by our colleagues at Yale) that work against law schools’ commitments to enhancing the socioeconomic persity of our classes; to allocating financial aid to students based on need; and, through loan repayment and public interest fellowships, to supporting graduates interested in careers serving the public interest.